Magic Magpie (quirrc) wrote in ljwin32_sema,
Magic Magpie
quirrc
ljwin32_sema

Please answer this poll to help to improve your favorite client.
Poll #180306 Future Semagic features

Spellchecking in Semagic

I don’t need spellchecking.
1289(42.3%)
Direct spellchecking via MSWord works at my computer and I use it.
415(13.6%)
I need it but don’t use because direct link to MSWord doesn’t work for me.
390(12.8%)
I need it but don’t use because I don’t have MSWord.
299(9.8%)
I don’t use direct link with MSWord though it works for me, because I prefer a built-in spellchecker.
435(14.3%)
I use copy/paste to MSWord and back because direct link doesn’t work.
119(3.9%)
I copy/paste to MSWord because I need to check more than just spelling (like punctuation).
101(3.3%)

Offline history in Semagic (available from the History dialog)

I don’t need an offline copy of my journal.
970(32.3%)
I’ll use such feature primarily to view entries offline (when I don’t have internet connection).
676(22.5%)
I’ll use such feature primarily to search within previous entries.
687(22.9%)
I’ll use such feature primarily to download all entries and then delete journal.
121(4.0%)
I’ll use such feature primarily to get a whole journal in one file (via Merge function) in order to print it.
476(15.9%)
I’ll use such feature primarily to search within communities.
73(2.4%)

Interface language in Semagic

I prefer to use English version.
2769(88.4%)
I am Russian but I prefer English interface and help.
152(4.9%)
I am Russian and I’ll use a Russian version if available.
183(5.8%)
I am Russian but I need only a Russian help file and I will not use Russian interface.
29(0.9%)

Special thanks to fey_fey.
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 105 comments
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →